The World Boxing Council (WBC) will host its 62nd Annual Convention from December 8-14 in Hamburg, Germany. This anticipated major boxing industry gathering features Evander Holyfield as a headline-making participant; making public announcement of his attendance is anticipated and is sure to generate widespread media interest.
Evander Holyfield, former undisputed heavyweight champion and four-time world heavyweight champion is revered as one of the greatest boxers ever seen on boxing’s stage. After retiring – yet remaining an influential voice within boxing by offering insightful analysis and opinions regarding various matches – Holyfield earned induction into the International Boxing Hall of Fame on June 2017 (despite still actively providing his analysis and comments about future fights ).
In a recent statement released on Instagram, Holyfield clarified that he will not be attending the WBC’s Annual Convention in Germany, contradicting any promotions suggesting his participation. He expressed pride in being considered for the event but reaffirmed his decision not to attend, emphasizing honesty, transparency, and integrity to his fans.
Evander Holyfield Challenges Mike Tyson to a Third Fight
Following Mike Tyson’s return to the ring for a bout against YouTube star Jake Paul, where Tyson faced a unanimous decision defeat, Holyfield saw an opportunity to call out Tyson for a trilogy fight. The rivalry between Holyfield and Tyson, marked by Holyfield’s two victories, including their notorious 1997 rematch where Tyson was disqualified, is legendary within boxing circles.
Holyfield shared a concept poster of their potential bout, noting it’s what his fans wanted, while Tyson showed little enthusiasm about this potential fight, emphasizing their friendship over this potential rivalry.
Holyfield’s announcement regarding the WBC convention underscores his ongoing dedication to his fans and followers, making sure they do not get misled about his participation at events. But his warning raises some eyebrows – was this meant as an indirect warning against attending or was simply misunderstood about who would attend?